mail@mabbaz.com Abu Dhabi, UAE

Asset Performance Management Software · APM suite

Honeywell Forge Asset Performance Management

by Honeywell

Honeywell vendor-agnostic asset health and performance platform, currently marketed as Honeywell Forge Performance+ for Industrials Asset Performance. Combines first-principles efficiency models, machine-learning anomaly detection and mechanical fault monitoring. On-premises or cloud.

Cloud, On-premises Commercial Last reviewed 7 November 2026 Documentation-based
Visit product site

What it is

The branding does resolve, with effort. Forge is a very broad Honeywell brand spanning buildings, cybersecurity, aerospace and industrial software, and the APM offering has been sold under several names. Honeywell’s own APM brochure, dated September 2024, settles it: its closing call to action directs readers to learn more about Honeywell Forge Performance+ for Industrials, Asset Performance, which is therefore the current marketed name, while the document itself is titled simply Asset Performance Management. The same brochure also names Asset Sentinel as the on-premises version of Honeywell’s asset performance product, which confirms the consolidation that third-party coverage had reported from the earlier Asset Sentinel, IR and IRIS products. Expect all of these names in proposals and references, and ask which underlying product and release is quoted.

Sensor requirement: no, and Honeywell states it twice over. The brochure describes a unified and vendor-agnostic platform allowing integration of data and custom models across different equipment types and OEM vendors into a single solution, and says it can connect the balance of plant assets across all sites and integrate with OEM condition-based monitoring systems. A 2025 Honeywell release on a North Sea deployment repeats the OEM-agnostic claim. Honeywell does sell optional sensors, Versatilis plug-and-play wireless sensors, for condition-based vibration monitoring, and it draws on Experion PKS Field Device Manager for instrument health and CCC control systems for turbomachinery, but none of that is a precondition. Notably, Corrosion Advisor is described as providing predictive corrosion insight without requiring corrosion sensors.

The mechanism is unusually well described, and it is a hybrid one rather than pure machine learning. Honeywell states it uses multiple modelling methods: first-principle-based efficiency models, machine-learning-powered anomaly detection algorithms, and mechanical fault monitoring as leading indicators, applying advanced analytics to a unified data set to recognise early signs of health issues and predict potential time to failure. It ships a standard asset model library of over forty asset types and more than one hundred asset variants, built by Honeywell engineers across reliability, instrumentation and controls, machinery, maintenance, process simulation and corrosion, and these include predefined fault models, fault trees, KPIs, causes, consequences and corrective actions. Honeywell also lists concrete failure modes it addresses, including boiler tube leakage, compressor lube oil system loss of pressure, furnace decoking cycle improvement, remaining useful life of a positive displacement pump and remaining corrosion allowance in crude distillation units. That is the level of specificity this category usually lacks.

Architecture is modular, with named Health Analytics and Performance Analytics submodules, a Configuration Studio, an Advanced Analytics Workbench, event management, performance case management and an explicit CMMS work order integration module. Deployment is on-premises or cloud-hosted via Honeywell Forge, and it can be rolled out incrementally from one site to an enterprise. Honeywell additionally offers subscription Remote Monitoring Services in which its own reliability experts own technical support, event monitoring and case management, so a managed wrapper is available. Honeywell publishes savings, earlier-detection and payback figures; none are recorded here.

Capabilities

Each capability carries its own verification status. “Not verified” means exactly that: it has not been checked, and must not be read as absent.

CapabilityStatusNotes
Reporting and dashboards Reliability and condition reporting and dashboards. Yes Event management, performance case management, Configuration Studio and an Advanced Analytics Workbench are named platform components. source
Work order and CMMS integration Creating or updating maintenance work from APM output. Yes CMMS work order integration is a named module in the integrated digital work processes layer, and APM is stated to integrate with existing CMMS systems. No specific CMMS product is named. source
Root cause analysis Structured root cause analysis of failures. Yes Asset models include predefined fault models, fault trees, causes, consequences and corrective actions, and first-principles performance monitoring is described as identifying degradation and its root causes. source
Reliability modelling Reliability and availability modelling of assets or systems. Yes Standard asset model library of over forty asset types and more than one hundred variants, vendor-agnostic and extensible, containing fault models, fault trees, KPIs, causes, consequences and corrective actions. source
Asset health scoring Composite asset health or condition indices. Yes Honeywell describes a cloud-native asset health solution with real-time monitoring of assets. source
Failure prediction Predicting failure or remaining useful life. Recorded only where a source describes it, not from AI claims. Yes Mechanism described: multiple modelling methods, first-principle efficiency models plus ML anomaly detection plus mechanical fault monitoring, applied to a unified data set to recognise early signs of health issues and predict potential time to failure. Named failure modes include boiler tube leakage, compressor lube oil loss of pressure, remaining useful life of a PD pump and remaining corrosion allowance. No accuracy, lead-time or savings figures recorded. source
Anomaly detection Detecting deviation from normal behaviour. Recorded only where a source describes the mechanism. Yes Mechanism described: machine-learning-powered anomaly detection algorithms used alongside first-principle efficiency models and mechanical fault monitoring as leading indicators, combined with pre-built fault symptom models. source
Vibration analysis Vibration measurement and spectral analysis. Yes Condition-based vibration monitoring is a named use case, using Honeywell Versatilis plug-and-play wireless sensors with near-real-time vibration analytics in APM. Sensors are optional, not required. source
Condition monitoring Monitoring asset condition from sensor or process data. Yes Near-real-time asset health and performance monitoring, including condition-based vibration monitoring with Versatilis wireless sensors and integration with OEM condition-based monitoring systems. source
Documented API A publicly documented API for integration. Not verified No public API documentation found. An Advanced Analytics Workbench is named but not described as an API.
SCADA and historian integration Reading from process historians, SCADA or control systems. Not verified
Sensor connectivity Connecting to sensors, whether the vendor supplies them or not. Not verified
Digital twin A simulation or model-based twin of physical assets. Not verified Digital twins are referenced in third-party analyst commentary and the brochure describes first-principles and simulation-derived models, but no Honeywell source describes a digital twin capability as such.
FMEA support Failure mode and effects analysis within the product. Not verified The asset models contain fault models, fault trees, causes, consequences and corrective actions, which is FMEA-like content, but Honeywell does not name FMEA as a supported method, so this is not credited.
Reliability-centred maintenance Structured RCM analysis and strategy development. Not verified RCM is not named as a supported method.

Deployment

ModelSupported
Cloud (vendor hosted) Yes
On-premises / self-hosted Yes
Hybrid Not verified

Integrations

Business applications

  • CMMS or EAM work management source

Iot

  • IoT sensors and platforms source

Licensing and pricing

ItemValue
Licensing modelCommercial
Free versionNo
Trial availableNot verified
Published priceContact vendor for pricing
NoteNo figure published by Honeywell. One third-party aggregator asserts an enterprise-quote-only model with no free tier; that is unverified and is not recorded as fact. The brochure and the product pages offer only contact and registration routes.
Pricing last checked7 November 2026

Prices move and discounting is common. Treat anything here as a starting point and confirm with the vendor before budgeting.

Strengths and limitations

Strengths

  • Explicitly vendor-agnostic. Honeywell states the platform allows integration of data and custom models across different equipment types and OEM vendors into a single solution, and integrates with OEM condition-based monitoring systems. Corrosion Advisor works without corrosion sensors. verified source
  • Hybrid modelling, described rather than asserted: first-principle efficiency models plus ML anomaly detection plus mechanical fault monitoring, over a library of 40-plus asset types and 100-plus variants containing fault models, fault trees, KPIs, causes, consequences and corrective actions. verified source
  • Runs on-premises or cloud-hosted via Honeywell Forge, is modular and scalable, and can be deployed incrementally from a single site to an enterprise, with CMMS work order integration as a named module. verified source

Limitations

  • The naming remains messy even though it resolves. Honeywell markets it as Forge Performance+ for Industrials Asset Performance while titling its own brochure Asset Performance Management and naming Asset Sentinel as the on-premises version, on top of the earlier IR and IRIS products. verified source
  • A model-led product is only as good as its coverage of your equipment. Honeywell states the library size but does not publish which forty asset types and hundred variants are included, so unusual assets are a risk. editorial

Who it suits

Organisation sizes: Enterprise

Fits: large process operators, and Honeywell is explicit about which: it says APM is commonly deployed from plant to enterprise level across oil and gas companies, fuel refineries, petrochemical facilities, chemical plants, semiconductor manufacturing and mines. The hybrid modelling approach suits organisations with standard process equipment, compressors, pumps, heat exchangers, fired heaters and rotating machinery, where the shipped asset model library applies, and the first-principles efficiency models mean it addresses energy and performance degradation as well as mechanical health. It suits buyers who want vendor-supplied models with embedded domain knowledge rather than building their own, and those with genuinely mixed-OEM estates, given the vendor-agnostic design. Mining fleet operators have a specific named offering for mobile and fixed equipment.

Does not fit: buyers wanting to bring their own algorithms as the primary approach; Honeywell offers an Advanced Analytics Workbench but the value proposition is its own models. It is a weak fit for unusual or bespoke equipment outside the forty-plus asset types and hundred-plus variants in the library, since a model-led product is only as good as its coverage of your assets. Buyers outside heavy process industry and mining, and any small or mid-sized operation, are out of scope: there is no published price, no self-serve route and no trial, and Honeywell’s own material describes multi-site deployments with asset counts in the thousands.

Typical use cases: predictive health analytics combining pre-built fault symptom models with machine-learning anomaly detection; condition-based vibration monitoring using Versatilis wireless sensors; instrument health monitoring via Experion PKS Field Device Manager; predictive corrosion monitoring through Corrosion Advisor without corrosion sensors; first-principles performance monitoring to find efficiency degradation and its root causes, optionally with UniSim Design; turbomachinery insight from CCC control systems; health monitoring of mobile and fixed mining fleets.

Buyer caution: get the exact product name and release in writing. With Asset Sentinel, IR, IRIS, Forge APM and Forge Performance+ all in the lineage, and Asset Sentinel specifically being the on-premises variant, a proposal and a reference customer may not describe the same deployment. Also establish whether the Remote Monitoring Service is included or separately subscribed.

Alternatives

GE Vernova Asset Performance Management GE Vernova The closest comparable broad APM suite for industrial and energy estates, modular, requiring no vendor sensors, covering asset health, reliability assessment, asset strategy, integrity and inspection. Where Honeywell describes a hybrid modelling method and names failure modes, GE Vernova asserts prediction without describing it, so failure prediction could not be verified there. GE Vernova also states no on-premises option, which Honeywell does through Asset Sentinel.
ABB Ability Genix APM ABB The other automation-major suite that explicitly needs no vendor hardware, runs on-premises or cloud, and sells as SaaS or a perpetual licence. It is a smaller, more modestly scoped product: Predict is a condition monitoring system that ABB says enables a path to predictive maintenance, with no prediction mechanism described, so failure prediction is unverified. Connector detail is ABB-centric and only the entry tier is publicly documented.
Aspen Mtell AspenTech (Emerson) Also verified for failure prediction, and the better fit if you want models trained on your own confirmed failure history rather than a vendor library. Mtell embeds FMEA to prescribe corrective action, which Honeywell does not name, and pushes coded work orders into the EAM. It depends on usable maintenance records, so a site with thin failure history will get an anomaly alarm system instead, and no deployment model is published at all.
AMS Optics Emerson A good answer if the real blocker is OT data consolidation rather than modelling. AMS Optics has the best-documented connectivity in the category, classic OPC, OPC UA, MQTT, Modbus, ODBC and custom web APIs on ingress with OPC and REST on egress, plus an embedded historian so a site without one is not blocked, and cloud, on-premises and hybrid. It is not a predictive product: Emerson attributes prediction to Aspen Mtell, a separate licence.
Predictive Asset Intelligence SymphonyAI Comparable shipped modelling structure, more than eighty thousand asset templates with FMEA libraries, plus the named connector list Honeywell lacks: PI System, AspenTech, SAP, SCADA and CMMS. It adds an edge deployment option for poorly connected sites. It does not carry Honeywell's first-principles efficiency modelling, so energy and performance degradation use cases do not transfer, and its failure prediction method is not published.

See the full Honeywell Forge Asset Performance Management alternatives guide

Compared with other products

Frequently asked questions

Honeywell Forge Performance+ for Industrials, Asset Performance. Honeywell’s own APM brochure, dated September 2024, closes by directing readers to that name, while titling the document itself Asset Performance Management. The same brochure names Asset Sentinel as the on-premises version, and the earlier IR and IRIS products were consolidated into this line.

No. Honeywell describes a unified, vendor-agnostic platform that integrates data and custom models across equipment types and OEM vendors, and integrates with OEM condition-based monitoring systems. Honeywell Versatilis wireless sensors are an option for vibration monitoring, not a requirement, and Corrosion Advisor is stated to work without corrosion sensors.

Yes. Honeywell states the platform can be deployed on-premises or cloud-hosted via Honeywell Forge, and names Asset Sentinel as the on-premises version of the asset performance product.

No. Honeywell publishes no figure, price band or trial term. It does offer separate subscription-based Remote Monitoring Services in which its own reliability experts own monitoring and case management.

Sources and review basis

  • Evaluation basis: vendor documentation and public sources, not hands-on testing
  • Last reviewed: 7 November 2026
  • Vendor: Honeywell

References

Disclosure

Alongside advisory work I also build a CMMS and CAFM platform, so I have a commercial interest in enterprise software generally. No vendor in this directory has paid for inclusion, placement or wording, and there are no reseller or affiliate arrangements. Weigh the analysis accordingly.

Evaluating Honeywell Forge Asset Performance Management?

Independent help testing it against your actual requirement, and designing the data integration it will depend on. 22+ years across ERP, EAM, CAFM and enterprise integration. No reseller arrangements.

Book a conversation

At a glance

Need a second opinion?

Independent evaluation help, with no vendor relationships.

Get in touch
MAbbaz.com
© MAbbaz.com